Thursday, November 12, 2009

11-12-09 D&D meeting minutes

D&D November 12, 2009
Present: Peter, Dan, Shawn, Robin, Fran, Scott, Lyman, Elizabeth, Sibyl,
Donna

1. Criteria Next OPAC
We filled out a form to prioritize criteria for evaluating next gen OPACs.
We can pull out those criteria that the system must have and put them
together so that we can simply eliminate those systems that don't meet
the required curricula—show stoppers
Some things we will not be ranking but will need to gather the info:
e.g. cost and estimated staff time.

We will send out the criteria for feedback from others in the library
after the next revision. We should ask an open-ended question of our
coworkers for now.

Deal breakers:
In production
Supports indexing & importation of records in a variety of metadata formats
Ability to add new indices
Integrates with Voyager ILS
Known item searching
Reliability
Displays library holdings and circ status
Book jackets
Look inside the book
Icons to distinguish one type of material from another
Natural language searching
Spell checking
faceted browsing
create durable URLs
Automatically populate LRA request
Ability to place links in Blackboard
API
Highly customizable

Usability standards and visual appeal need to be added.

Will students ever use the OPAC, no matter how nice we make it?
Maybe we don't want to spend the most money on this system or spend the
most time on it.
OPAC needs to have more online content because most of our users are not
in the building.
Google is really bad at known item searching.

Donna

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Re: D&D Minutes 10/29/09

Hi all,

I missed this meeting, as I had to take a kid to the doctor's office.

I just wanted to say how impressed I was with the Linksource
subcommittee's report. We've been talking about this for so long -- it
was really great to have some real data available, and it was really
well presented. Great job!

Selene

Donna O'Malley wrote:
> D&D October 29, 2009
> Present: Peter, Dan, Shawn, Robin, Fran, Scott, Lyman, Elizabeth, Donna
>
> 1. Criteria Next OPAC
> Should next OPAC be able to pull in CDI and Special Collections
> records along with Voyager records—yes, and it should look good doing
> it. Higher priority.
> Should the next OPAC be able to search external databases too?—yes,
> and look good doing it. Lower priority. How about CRL?
>
> 2. Hathi Trust (260,000 records)
> Catalogers' response raised concern about difficulties with leading
> articles in titles. Lyman said these could be fixed. Some issues with
> data being located in different fields than what we use, but we could
> move these if it's a problem for patrons.
> Amounts to a 17% increase in size of our database, with old material.
> If it turns out that these records drown out records to our original
> collection, we'll have to delete them. Loading will take time.
> Unloading will take time if we have to do it.
> Catalogers are concerned about degrading the indexes in Voyager, which
> may refer to authority control. It may be that the Hathi Trust
> records' date format will cause them to not sort properly.
> Next step is for Lyman to load 1000 records into Voyager and see how
> that works.
> We'll try it and at our next meeting we'll work on a survey.
>
> 3. LinkSource report
> Linksource fails to get to the article at all 20% of the time. 19% of
> the time you get to the A to Z list and can work your way to the
> article with effort. Our theory is that linksource's database has many
> variant titles for journals.
> Another problem is that we can't successfully prioritize the vendors.
> Linksource seems to override this ranking and pushes us to EJS.
> Identified problems:
> 1. Linksource fails (20%), perhaps because database is not clean.
> 2. Linksource sends you to the A to Z list (19%). This should never
> happen.
> 3. Linksource doesn't consistently accept our prioritizing of vendors,
> and often sends users to EJS instead of the publisher.
> 4. Linksource customer service has been unable to fix problems 2 and
> 3, and is sometimes slow to correct errors in their databases.
> 5. Linksource's intermediate page is difficult to customize and make
> attractive.
> 6. We'd like more functionality, for example, we'd like to turn on
> parts of Lexis/Nexis and turn of others.
>
> We can send the report on to the Dean's council with a cover letter
> from Peter.
>
> 4. Commenting in the OPAC
> Not used much at other locations

--
Selene Colburn
Asst. to Dean for External Relations
University of Vermont Libraries
Bailey-Howe Library
538 Main St.
Burlington, Vt. 05405
Phone: 802.656.9980
Fax: 802.656.4038
Email: selene.colburn@uvm.edu